MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4384524494 · doi:10.4324/9781003433996-2

A word from the editor

2023· book-chapter· en· W4384524494 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elizabeth Mackinlay, Ann Harrington

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAging and Gerontology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWord (group theory)LinguisticsHistoryComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current issue of the journal reflects the 8th International Conference on Ageing and Spirituality. These conferences have taken place in Australia, England and the U.S. Prior to the current COVID-19 the 9 th International Conference was planned. At this point this next conference is planning for 2021. For more information, please contact: Jane Kuepfer, RP, MDiv, PhD, Conrad Grebel University College, Waterloo, Canada, https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="mailto:jane.kuepfer@uwaterloo.ca">jane.kuepfer@uwaterloo.ca .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1050.080

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAging and Gerontology Research→French-language works237,207→