MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384562182 · doi:10.2147/ppa.s418246

Factors Influencing Medication Adherence in Elderly Patients with Hypertension: A Single Center Study in Western China

2023· article· en· W4384562182 on OpenAlexaff
Qiuyu Pan, Cheng Zhang, Lansicheng Yao, C.W. Mai, Jinpeng Zhang, Zhitong Zhang, Jun Hu

Bibliographic record

VenuePatient Preference and Adherence · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedication Adherence and Compliance
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSingle CenterChinaMedication adherenceCenter (category theory)Family medicineGerontologyTraditional medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To develop and empirically test a conceptual model that explains the factors influencing antihypertensive medication adherence behavior in elderly patients in a city in western China. Patients and Methods: The conceptual model was based on the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Health Belief Model and was empirically tested using cross-sectional survey data from Nanchong City, a city in western China, collected between October and December 2020. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Results: Behavioral intentions were the main predictor of medication adherence behavior (path coefficient of 0.353). Perceived benefits and perceived barriers directly (path coefficient = 0.201 and -0.150, respectively), and indirectly (path coefficient = 0.118 and -0.060) through behavioral intentions, influenced medication adherence behavior. Perceived susceptibility (path coefficient = 0.390) and perceived severity (path coefficient = 0.408) influenced behavioral attitudes, which influenced behavioral intentions (path coefficient = 0.298). Conclusion: The conceptual model demonstrates a robust ability to predict and explain medication adherence behavior among elderly patients with hypertension, facilitating the adoption and maintenance of changes in adherence behavior and the potential for preventing disease progression and improving quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.881

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePatient Preference and AdherenceSame topicMedication Adherence and ComplianceFrench-language works237,207