MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384570106 · doi:10.23977/acss.2023.070515

Design and Implementation of Smart Agriculture System Based on Wireless Sensors Networks

2023· article· en· W4384570106 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuting Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Computer Signals and Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData collectionWireless sensor networkUploadComputer scienceApplication layerWirelessComputer networkEthernetTelecommunicationsEngineeringWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of information and communication technology has provided the conditions for the advancement of smart agriculture. This article focuses on designing a smart agriculture system based on wireless sensor network technology for large-scale outdoor cultivation of grain crops, aiming to provide scientific guidance for increasing crop yield and applying scientific and technological advancements to modern agricultural production. The design of the smart agriculture system in this article is divided into two parts: the perception layer and the network layer. The perception layer includes data collection terminals and control terminals. The data collection terminals are used for acquiring and transmitting environmental parameters of crops, while the control terminals are used to regulate the environmental parameters of agricultural equipment. Both the data collection terminals and control terminals employ LoRa wireless communication technology to achieve long-range data transmission. The network layer consists of LoRa gateways, which connect to the network server via Ethernet and are responsible for uploading data from the data collection terminals and control terminals, as well as issuing control commands. Finally, the article conducted functional tests on the smart agriculture system, and the results indicated that all functions and performance of the system met the expected requirements. The system is capable of long-range data collection and transmission, meeting the demands of smart agriculture, and has promising application prospects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Computer Signals and SystemsSame topicSmart Agriculture and AIFrench-language works237,207