MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384571074 · doi:10.23977/jaip.2023.060409

Study on Inversion of Damage Incentives of High Pile Wharf in Inland River Based on SEResNet

2023· article· en· W4384571074 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jia Li, Cai Fenglin, Zhu Qitao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence Practice · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Computational Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChongqing University of Science and TechnologyChongqing Municipal Education CommissionChongqing University
KeywordsPileWharfParameterized complexityFinite element methodInversion (geology)Structural engineeringGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceGeologyAlgorithmSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on SEResNet neural network algorithm, the inversion model of damage incentives of inland high-piled wharf is constructed. The stress data of pile foundation under the action of damage incentives of high-piled wharf are obtained by using solid element finite element model calculation and indoor model test methods. The parameterized finite element calculation model of high-piled wharf is established by using subprocess in Python program to call MANSYS module, and verified with solid element model. The parameterized simplified finite element model meets the needs of inversion calculation. Based on the stress data samples of the pile foundation of the high-piled wharf obtained from the model test, the inversion analysis of single and multiple damage incentives is carried out. The model can identify the location, size and type of injury causative agent with good generalization ability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Artificial Intelligence PracticeSame topicAdvanced Computational Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207