MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384625936 · doi:10.1111/iwj.14321

The world of wound care loses a true legend: Dr. Barbara Braden

2023· editorial· en· W4384625936 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Keith G Harding, Douglas Queen

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Wound Journal · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBachelorBattleLegendMedicineGerontologyNursingArt historyHistoryPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

in 1975 and her doctoral degree from the University of Texas at Austin in 1988.She is best known for her work in the development of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk, which has been translated into many languages and is used on all continents.Dr. Braden is a Fellow of the American Academy of Nursing, and a past member of the NPUAP board of directors.In her own words in an interview with Wounds Canada in 2007, she explained her surprising journey.'I authored the tool out of my expertise in clinical nursing

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.397 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Wound JournalSame topicPressure Ulcer Prevention and ManagementFrench-language works237,207