MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384626374 · doi:10.1002/bdr2.2221

Leflunomide exposure through second trimester of pregnancy: A case report

2023· article· en· W4384626374 on OpenAlexaff
Rawan Alothman, J. Yeung, Elizabeth A. Waterman, Christa Lepik, Neda Amiri

Bibliographic record

VenueBirth Defects Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsResearch CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeflunomideMedicinePregnancyCholestyramineGestationRegimenFirst trimesterInternal medicineRheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leflunomide is a commonly used disease modifying antirheumatic agent. However, its use is contraindicated in pregnancy. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines recommend discontinuing Leflunomide at least 24 months before conception. If a woman is found to be pregnant while on Leflunomide, ACR suggests close monitoring and cholestyramine washout. We describe a case of a patient with a history of juvenile idiopathic arthritis who was on Leflunomide throughout the first and second trimester of her pregnancy. A cholestyramine washout regimen was started but not completed. The patient was induced at 37 weeks of gestation due to non-reassuring fetal heart rate. She ultimately delivered a healthy baby via emergency cesarian section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score0.709

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBirth Defects ResearchSame topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207