Tocar lo social, bailar lo social, cantar lo social: de “Dilo en voz alta (soy negro y estoy orgulloso)” hasta Fandango Sin Fronteras
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente ensayo analiza el movimiento Fandango Sin Fronteras como representativo de las políticas populares transnacionales contemporáneas en un contexto más amplio de la música y los movimientos sociales. Se pretende resaltar una faceta particular de los flujos globales contemporáneos estrechamente relacionados con la construcción de comunidades translocales a través de la música participativa. Durante más de una década el movimiento Fandango Sin Fronteras ha producido redes móviles para apoyar la creación de comunidades de la diáspora a través de la difusión de sonido, ritmo y danza como una forma de convivencia entre las culturas caribeñas de Veracruz, México, y varias ciudades en los EE.UU. y Canadá, como Los Ángeles, Seattle, Chicago y Toronto, así como a lo largo de la conflictiva frontera MéxicoEstados Unidos. Proyectos de música como el proyecto de diáspora transnacional Fandango Sin Fronteras son esfuerzos musicales que están en estrecha relación con las culturas participativas contemporáneas y sus ideales de una nueva sociedad cívica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".