MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384665230 · doi:10.1159/000525899

Left Superior Homonymous Quadrantanopia due to Giant Virchow-Robin Space

2023· article· en· W4384665230 on OpenAlexaff
Michelle H. Lim, Jonathan A. Micieli

Bibliographic record

VenueCase Reports in Ophthalmology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsKensington HealthUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGeniculate bodyVisual fieldMagnetic resonance imagingAnatomyOphthalmologyRadiologyNeuroscienceVisual cortexPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 51-year-old man was referred by his optometrist for an incidental finding of a visual field defect. Humphrey 24-2 SITA-Fast visual field testing revealed a left superior homonymous quadrantanopia, and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed a 2.0 × 0.5-cm oblong-shaped cerebrospinal fluid space posterior to the right basal ganglia. This space coursed close to the lateral geniculate body and was thought to represent a giant perivascular (Virchow-Robin) space. This case demonstrates that patients with a visual field defect without other neurological symptoms could be a result of an enlarged Virchow-Robin space along the visual pathway.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.184
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCase Reports in OphthalmologySame topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusFrench-language works237,207