MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384696335 · doi:10.22215/etd/2023-15547

Modelling and Simulation of Seasonal, Solar Driven Sorption Thermal Energy Storage in Cold Climate Residential Application

2023· dissertation· en· W4384696335 on OpenAlexaffabout
Isabelle Rose Kosteniuk

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdsorption and Cooling Systems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTRNSYSSorptionSorbentThermal energy storageEnvironmental scienceVolume (thermodynamics)Passive solar building designSolar energyWaste managementThermalNuclear engineeringEnvironmental engineeringMaterials scienceProcess engineeringMeteorologyEngineeringThermodynamicsChemistryAdsorptionPhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, a sorption thermal energy storage system was modelled in TRNSYS and integrated with existing building performance models of a single-detached residential dwelling equipped with an array of evacuated-tube solar thermal collectors in Ottawa, Ontario.The proposed sorption system consists of a closed, modular reactor layout and uses a lithium chloride composite-salt-in-porous-matrix/water working pair and an idealized evaporative heat source.Results of a parametric study found that an overall solar fraction of 90% could be achieved for an energy efficient house with 2000 kg of sorbent material and a total system volume of 9.3 m 3 , and a 95.4% overall solar fraction could be achieved with 3000 kg of sorbent and a total system volume of 25.3 m 3 .The sorption system was able to meet an equivalent fraction of the building's energy demands as a 42.1 m 3 sensible STES while taking up only 60% as much volume.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdsorption and Cooling SystemsFrench-language works237,207