MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4384696488 · doi:10.22215/etd/2023-15516

New Measurement of 39Ar Lifetime and Projected Sensitivities for Time-Varying Signals with the DEAP-3600 Detector

2023· dissertation· en· W4384696488 on OpenAlexaff
G. Kaur

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDetectorWIMPPhysicsDark matterSensitivity (control systems)SIGNAL (programming language)Modulation (music)Nuclear physicsRecoilWeakly interacting massive particlesOpticsParticle physicsElectronic engineeringComputer scienceAcousticsEngineeringCosmologyAstrophysicsDark energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DEAP-3600 is a single-phase dark matter experiment searching for direct detection of elastic nuclear scatters of the dark matter candidate, WIMPs, with 3279 kg of liquid argon.In addition to the elastic interaction of the dark matter, theories also predict the modulation in this signal rate with time which is not expected in the backgrounds in the experiment.Observing this modulation signal will extend the sensitivity of the WIMP search in the experiment.The DEAP detector has recorded more than 3 years of physics data, and the absolute stability of the detector over the time of data collection allows the analysis of event rates in the detector data, which complements many other interesting analyses, such as a precise measurement of the lifetime of the 39 Ar isotope.The 878 days of live time are used to measure the 39 Ar lifetime by fitting the trigger rates with a decay model describing the data.The result, the first measurement to directly observe the decay curve of 39 Ar, shows a lifetime of 438 ± 10 (stat) ± 8 (syst) years, in tension with the literature value of 388 ± 4 years.A detailed systematic study of the detector is also performed to understand data that will contribute to the sensitivity of the detector for the modulation of the nuclear signal.This study indicated the requirement of a detector threshold of 5 keV or less to observe the annual modulation in the nuclear recoil signal.The DEAP experiment would need to collect new data at this lower hardware threshold and a more complete understanding of the detector backgrounds would be required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena→French-language works237,207→