MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4384697252 · doi:10.22215/etd/2023-15479

Pharmacotherapeutic effects of cannabidiol in autism spectrum disorders

2023· dissertation· en· W4384697252 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Parkhill

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCannabidiolOpen fieldNoveltyAutismPsychologyAutism spectrum disorderKnockout mouseMedicinePsychiatryPharmacologyNeuroscienceInternal medicineCannabis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a group of neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by social deficits and restrictive/repetitive behaviour.ASD is diagnosed in roughly 1-2% of the global population.Despite the prevalence of ASD, very few pharmaceutical interventions have been approved for its treatment.The endocannabinoid system (ECS) has recently gained interest as a potential target for treating ASD.Cannabidiol (CBD), a compound found in the Cannabis (C.Sativa) plant, has been highlighted as a potential drug through which the ECS can be mediated.Due to its non-psychoactive nature, and its efficacy in ameliorating ASD-associated symptoms in Fragile X syndrome (FXS) patients, an investigation into its effectiveness in treating ASD is warranted.In this present thesis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CBD in treating social deficits and restrictive/repetitive behaviours in Fmr1 and Shank3 knockout mice.These models serve as two well-characterized monogenetic animal models of ASD.To account for a knowledge gap in the literature surrounding the treatment of ASD, both male and female mice were used.Mice were assigned to the 3-chamber social test, or self-grooming and open field tests.Mice received subcutaneous injections of either vehicle or CBD (5mg/kg for males, 50mg/kg for females).On the first day, mice performed their respective tests to establish a baseline for behaviour.For the 4 following days, mice received 1 injection daily.On the 6 th day, mice were given another injection.An hour later, they were subjected to their post-injection behavioural testing.Results from the 3-chamber social test showed that both knockout models displayed deficits in social novelty.This deficit was recovered following the administration of CBD.Self-grooming analysis and open-field testing showed no effect of CBD.These findings suggest CBD exerts its therapeutic effects through regions specific to social memory, likely the CA1 and CA2 regions of the hippocampus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research→French-language works237,207→