MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384697338 · doi:10.21423/aabppro20228610

Field rumen fistula surgery (indications and procedure)

2023· article· en· W4384697338 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTexas A&M University Libraries · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal health and immunology
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRumenFistulaMedicineSurgeryBiologyIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rumen fistulation (bloat surgery) is a valuable procedure to manage chronic bloat in cattle. Case selection and proper pre­operative assessment is imperative as this procedure should be reserved for animals that have chronic recurring free gas bloat and will remain in the production phase for a sufficient period to warrant the invasiveness of the procedure. Not all animals with chronic bloat are ideal candidates for a rumen fistula; however, in those that are, the procedure is relatively simple and quick to perform. Postoperative care includes analgesia and broad-spec­trum antimicrobials, and if the animal does not succumb to the underlying condition that may be contributing to chronic bloat, the prognosis for these animals is generally good.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it