MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384697633 · doi:10.22215/etd/2023-15598

Numerical analysis of Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuators for supersonic flow applications

2023· dissertation· en· W4384697633 on OpenAlexaff
Aliaksandr Murzionak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasma actuatorSupersonic speedPlasmaMechanicsMaterials scienceElectric fieldChoked flowDielectric barrier dischargeAtomic physicsDielectricPhysicsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuator (SDBD PA) is a device that allows for a flow control near a surface of an object. In its simplest form the device consists of one electrode exposed to the atmosphere, dielectric and encapsulated grounded electrode. The device generates strong electric due to high voltage applied to the exposed electrode. Under the effect of the strong electric field the gas in the atmosphere is ionized and turns into plasma, which is manipulated by changing the electric field. The energy from the plasma is transferred to the surrounding gas through particle collisions allowing for the airflow control. The current work is concentrated on the supersonic applications of SDBD PA and aims at answering two questions: • What effects does supersonic shock have on plasma generated by SDBD PA? • What effects does SDBD PA have on supersonic shock? To answer these questions an OpenFOAM solver was developed that allows to simulate plasma within a supersonic flow. The solver is based on electron-positive nitrogen ions drift-diffusion model for plasma. Several simulations are performed to observe the plasma behaviour: plasma propagation through a frozen shock along a flat plate, supersonic flow under free-slip and no-slip conditions around a wedge with SDBD PA at the tip of the wedge. The Mach number varied from 1.3 to 2, depending on the simulation. The results demonstrate that as the plasma passes through the shock from low to high pressure side the ionization process is slowed down. If the rise in pressure across the shock is too high then it is possible to quench the ionization process completely. During the plasma propagation along the dielectric surface, the current flowing through the plasma generates heat, which in turn generates a compression wave. Most of the heating is concentrated within the plasma front, therefore as long as the plasma continues to propagate the source of compression wave is also being shifted. This allows for airflow adjustment within the supersonic flow boundary layer. Further research is needed to optimise the SDPD PA geometry and operational profile for supersonic flow control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlasma and Flow Control in AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207