“Where ladies are so scarce we have to muster in full”: Sophie Porter’s Account of Over–Wintering at Herschel Island, 1894-1895
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sophie E. Porter’s account offers colourful insights into the life of the whaling community over–wintering at Herschel Island (Qikiqtaruk) in the mid–1890s. Porter lived on board the whaling ship Jesse H. Freeman in the winterized quarters prepared for her husband, but her full social schedule meant that the ship did not keep her captive. The excerpts transcribed, reproduced, and introduced in this commentary span the period from 19 August 1894 (when Jessie H. Freeman dropped anchor off the sand spit at Herschel) to Victoria Day (24 May) 1895. Porter’s account offers rare insights into how women and other members of the diverse Herschel Island community negotiated gender, race, and class positions and coped with life in this remote Arctic outpost. Le récit de Sophie E. Porter offre un aperçu imagé de la vie de la communauté baleinière qui a passé l’hiver à l’île Herschel (Qikiqtaruk) au milieu des années 1890. Porter vivait à bord du baleinier Jesse H. Freeman dans les locaux aménagés pour l’hiver préparés pour son mari, mais son calendrier d’activités sociales était chargé même si elle était à bord d’un navire. Les extraits transcrits, reproduits et présentés dans cet exposé couvrent la période du 19 août 1894 (lorsque le Jessie H. Freeman a jeté l’ancre près de la flèche de sable à l’île Herschel) à la fête de la Reine du 24 mai 1895. Le récit de Porter offre un regard unique sur la façon dont les femmes et les autres membres de la communauté hétérogène de l’île Herschel déterminaient leurs positions de genre, de race et de classe et faisaient face aux difficultés de la vie dans cet avant–poste isolé de l’Arctique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".