Le bassin de la Sarre. Exégèse d’un ouvrage équivoque de Paul Vidal de la Blache et Lucien Gallois
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peu après la Grande Guerre paraissait, sous la signature de Paul Vidal de la Blache et Lucien Gallois, Le bassin de la Sarre. Clauses du traité de Versailles. Étude historique et économique. Notre but, dans le présent article, est d’expliquer le contexte qui fit advenir cet ouvrage. Une analyse bibliologique permet d’examiner l’évolution de son corpus textuel et iconographique depuis sa première formulation au sein du Comité d’études, créé en 1917 pour définir les buts de guerre de la France. Il s’avère que Le bassin de la Sarre, tout en affichant la neutralité qui sied à la science, est fortement arrimé au traité de Versailles signé le 28 juin 1919, en soutenant la position de la France face au destin national de cette région contestée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".