Metamorphic P–T–t evolution deciphered from episodic monazite growth in granulites of the Chencai Complex and implications for the Early Paleozoic Orogeny, West Cathaysia terrane, South China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Early Paleozoic Orogeny in eastern South China has been highly controversial. It has been alternatively interpreted to have formed in an intra-plate setting driven by far-field tectonic forces or at plate boundaries involving subduction–collision. The West Cathaysia terrane in the core of the orogen is characterized by extensive magmatism, intense deformation and especially high-grade metamorphism. Identifying early Paleozoic high-pressure (HP) metamorphism and establishing a complete P–T–t path from the high-grade metamorphic rocks could help us understand the tectono-thermal evolution process and nature of the Early Paleozoic Orogeny. Here, we present results from a felsic granulite from the Chencai Complex in the northeastern West Cathaysia terrane. Petrographic evidence, mineral compositions and phase equilibria modelling indicate that the granulite underwent a pre-peak HP stage with P–T conditions of 13.3–14.7 kbar/696–718°C and low geothermal gradients of 13–14°C km −1 , and a peak high-temperature stage with P–T conditions of 9.7–11.0 kbar/785–820°C. A clockwise P–T path involving pre-peak decompressional heating, post-peak near-isothermal decompression and near-isobaric cooling processes was constrained for the HP felsic granulite. In situ monazite U–Pb geochronology combined with previous results date these metamorphic processes at c. 440, c. 425 and c. 400 Ma, respectively. Our new metamorphic and geochronological data from the HP felsic granulite support the case that the Early Paleozoic Orogeny was a typical collisional one.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".