« Clore Avril. » Le deuil de la révolution dans Bon peuple portugais de Rui Simões et Gestes et fragments d’Alberto Seixas Santos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au début des années 1980, deux films, Bon peuple portugais (1981) de Rui Simões et Gestes et fragments (1982) d’Alberto Seixas Santos, sont finalisés au Portugal dans des circonstances difficiles ; quelques années seulement après la Révolution portugaise de 1974-1975, il semblait incomber à ces deux projets de représenter le « deuil » de cette période révolutionnaire. Ce texte interroge ainsi la place de ces deux films-essais dans le cinéma portugais de l’époque. Capables d’interroger la mémoire encore vive de l’événement et d’intervenir dans l’écriture possible de cette histoire, les deux projets mettent plus particulièrement en perspective la figure d’Otelo Saraiva de Carvalho, qui apparaît comme une icône ambiguë de cette dernière révolution romantique d’Europe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".