MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384785340 · doi:10.7202/1101530ar

Non au père ! La paternité défaillante dans la transcréation québécoise

2023· article· fr· W4384785340 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Marie Pascal

Bibliographic record

VenueCinémas Revue d études cinématographiques · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsThe King's UniversityWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Si la figure de la mère est abjecte – à en croire sa propension à emprisonner sa progéniture dans une dyade mortifère –, elle a parfois aussi des conséquences sur un autre angle du triangle familial : le père. Démis de ses fonctions, violeur ou surpuissant, ce dernier pèche soit par le « trop-peu » (absence, indifférence), soit par le « trop-plein » (abus d’autorité, inceste), pour reprendre les termes de Lori Saint-Martin. Afin de définir les impacts de sa défaillance, nous tiendrons compte de quatre paires textes/films portant sur la figure du père, souvent éludée avant que ne s’ouvrent ces récits de filiation. À travers Littoral (Mouawad 1999 ; 2004) ; Le sexe des étoiles (Proulx 1987 ; Baillargeon 1993) ; La petite fille qui aimait trop les allumettes (Soucy 1998 ; Lavoie 2017) et C’est le coeur qui meurt en dernier (Lalonde 2013 ; Durand-Brault 2017), nous étudions différentes strates de la narration filmique, en deçà ou au-delà de ce qui est offert par les hypotextes, cernant les contours du père défaillant ainsi que ses conséquences sur l’identité des narrateurs et narratrices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.018
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCinémas Revue d études cinématographiquesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207