MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

How to accurately fast-track sorbent selection for post-combustion CO2 capture? A comparative assessment of data-driven and simplified physical models for screening sorbents

2023· book-chapter· en· W4384788982 on OpenAlexafffund
Sai Gokul Subraveti, Luca Riboldi, Huan-Wei Xu, Yannick Jooss, Simon Roussanaly, Leif Erik Andersson, Rahul Anantharaman

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer-aided chemical engineering/Computer aided chemical engineering · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersBundesamt für EnergieEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilUniversity of AlbertaNatural Environment Research CouncilRéseau de cancérologie RossyDepartment for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, UK Government
KeywordsComputer scienceProcess (computing)Set (abstract data type)Selection (genetic algorithm)Biochemical engineeringMachine learningEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueComputer-aided chemical engineering/Computer aided chemical engineeringSame topicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207