MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4384816820 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxad039

Preparing the next generation of paediatricians: The importance of clinical informatics education

2023· article· en· W4384816820 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rageen Rajendram, Mirriam Mikhail, Kristina Garrels, Daniel Rosenfield, Karim Jessa

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMobile Health and mHealth Applications
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSick childMedicineLibrary scienceFamily medicinePediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As healthcare becomes more reliant on technology, it is crucial that we train the next generation of paediatricians to be proficient in clinical informatics. At the Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, we have developed a clinical informatics elective that aims to provide paediatric residents with the skills and knowledge they need to effectively use technology in the delivery of care. The core of the elective is a 2-week or 4-week program that includes meetings with informatics leaders at the hospital, core readings, and core deliverables. These deliverables are designed to help residents reflect on their learning about clinical informatics and its role in healthcare, and how their experiences will influence their future careers. One of the key goals of the elective is to introduce residents to the field of clinical informatics, highlighting areas of growth, quality improvement and more. The elective also covers the Epic Electronic Health Record system, including its strengths and weaknesses, and explores the role of information services (IS) and governance in clinical informatics. Additionally, residents have the opportunity to learn about the IS structure at the hospital and how clinical informatics relates to IS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.103
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.103
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0130.017
Open science0.0020.014
Research integrity0.0090.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicMobile Health and mHealth Applications→French-language works237,207→