MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384820707 · doi:10.1142/s1793524523500584

Fear effect exerted by carnivore in grassland ecosystem

2023· article· en· W4384820707 on OpenAlexafffund
Pingping Cong, Meng Fan, Xingfu Zou

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Biomathematics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCarnivoreHerbivoreGrasslandPredationEcosystemEcologyAlternative stable statePredatorOscillation (cell signaling)Environmental scienceStability (learning theory)ChaoticBiologyEconomicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A four-dimensional mathematical model is formulated to explore the fear effect exerted by large carnivore in the grassland ecosystem. The model depicts the interactions among herbage, domestic herbivore, wild herbivore and large carnivore, which incorporates both direct predation and anti-predator mechanisms. The dynamic properties of the model are analytically investigated, including the dissipativity of solutions, and the existence and stability of different equilibria. Some numerical simulations are also presented to exhibit rich dynamical behaviors, such as various types of bistabilities, periodic oscillation and chaotic oscillation. The study reveals that the appropriate level of fear factors can stabilize the system and increase the density of herbage and domestic herbivore. The fear effect plays an important role in maintaining the balance of the grassland ecosystem and promoting the economy of human society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of BiomathematicsSame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207