Scalable querying of human cell atlases via a foundational model reveals commonalities across fibrosis-associated macrophages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) studies have profiled over 100 million human cells across diseases, developmental stages, and perturbations to date. A singular view of this vast and growing expression landscape could help reveal novel associations between cell states and diseases, discover cell states in unexpected tissue contexts, and relate in vivo cells to in vitro models. However, these require a common, scalable representation of cell profiles from across the body, a general measure of their similarity, and an efficient way to query these data. Here, we present SCimilarity, a metric learning framework to learn and search a unified and interpretable representation that annotates cell types and instantaneously queries for a cell state across tens of millions of profiles. We demonstrate SCimilarity on a 22.7 million cell corpus assembled across 399 published scRNA-seq studies, showing accurate integration, annotation and querying. We experimentally validated SCimilarity by querying across tissues for a macrophage subset originally identified in interstitial lung disease, and showing that cells with similar profiles are found in other fibrotic diseases, tissues, and a 3D hydrogel system, which we then repurposed to yield this cell state in vitro . SCimilarity serves as a foundational model for single cell gene expression data and enables researchers to query for similar cellular states across the entire human body, providing a powerful tool for generating novel biological insights from the growing Human Cell Atlas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".