Slowing Extrusion Tectonics and Accelerated Uplift of Northern Tibet Since the Mid‐Miocene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Mechanisms of northern Tibet crustal thickening are strongly debated. Here we present a high‐resolution and continuous record (24–4.8 Ma) of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility and paleomagnetic declination from the Dahonggou section in the northern Qaidam Basin, northern Tibet. Our results reveal two major clockwise rotations of the regional paleostress field at ∼15 Ma (∼20°) and ∼8.4 Ma (∼15°), coeval with episodes of mountain building and basin deformation in northern Tibet. We suggest that simultaneous stress field rotation and uplift observed in the study area are related to progressively slowing lateral‐extrusion tectonics along boundary‐parallel strike‐slip faults (Altyn Tagh and Haiyuan faults). The 15 Ma event can be explained by the transition from northeastward to eastward extrusion of northern Tibet materials due to the obstruction of the rigid Alxa block. As deformation keeps migrating toward the east, the 8 Ma event is possibly related to a change from eastward to southeastward extrusion of northeastern Tibet materials as a result of the resistance of the rigid Ordos block. We conclude that Tibetan deformation evolved through successive stages of slowing extrusion tectonics since the mid‐Miocene. Deformation was initially localized along pre‐existing lithospheric structures, and subsequently more distributed under confining boundary conditions, leading to crustal thickening and uniform uplift of northern Tibet during the late stage of plateau development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".