Multi-Class Skin Cancer Classification Using Vision Transformer Networks and Convolutional Neural Network-Based Pre-Trained Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Skin cancer, particularly melanoma, has been recognized as one of the most lethal forms of cancer. Detecting and diagnosing skin lesions accurately can be challenging due to the striking similarities between the various types of skin lesions, such as melanoma and nevi, especially when examining the color images of the skin. However, early diagnosis plays a crucial role in saving lives and reducing the burden on medical resources. Consequently, the development of a robust autonomous system for skin cancer classification becomes imperative. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been widely employed over the past decade to automate cancer diagnosis. Nonetheless, the emergence of the Vision Transformer (ViT) has recently gained a considerable level of popularity in the field and has emerged as a competitive alternative to CNNs. In light of this, the present study proposed an alternative method based on the off-the-shelf ViT for identifying various skin cancer diseases. To evaluate its performance, the proposed method was compared with 11 CNN-based transfer learning methods that have been known to outperform other deep learning techniques that are currently in use. Furthermore, this study addresses the issue of class imbalance within the dataset, a common challenge in skin cancer classification. In addressing this concern, the proposed study leverages the vision transformer and the CNN-based transfer learning models to classify seven distinct types of skin cancers. Through our investigation, we have found that the employment of pre-trained vision transformers achieved an impressive accuracy of 92.14%, surpassing CNN-based transfer learning models across several evaluation metrics for skin cancer diagnosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".