MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384834033 · doi:10.1093/omcr/omad066

Control of porphyria cutanea tarda with anti-IL-17 secukinumab in a person with psoriasis living with HIV

2023· article· en· W4384834033 on OpenAlexafffund
Helbies Bedier, Stéphane Isnard, Réjean Thomas, Jean‐Pierre Routy

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford Medical Case Reports · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPorphyrin Metabolism and Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Foundation for AIDS ResearchStyrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
KeywordsMedicinePorphyria cutanea tardaSecukinumabPsoriasisDermatologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)ImmunologyPsoriatic arthritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 65-year-old woman successfully treated for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Hepatitis C virus was diagnosed with porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT) and treated by phlebotomies. She developed extensive psoriatic skin lesions resistant to topical treatments and methotrexate. She then received the anti-interleukin-17 (IL-17) secukinumab (Cosentyx) which improved her psoriatic skin lesions. Unexpectedly, her PCT skin lesions healed, allowing phlebotomy discontinuation over 2 years. Without lesions, the patient decided to discontinue secukinumab, leading to the recurrence of psoriatic and PCT skin lesions, which were controlled upon therapeutical rechallenge. No AIDS-related manifestations or infections developed, her CD4 count remained elevated and her HIV viral load was controlled under antiretroviral therapy. Both skin conditions and consequently the patient's quality of life have improved with secukinumab, allowing exposure to sunlight and phlebotomy discontinuation for >4 years. Likely, the IL-17 pathway is involved in the clinical manifestations of PCT, opening new avenues for therapeutical interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.743

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford Medical Case ReportsSame topicPorphyrin Metabolism and DisordersFrench-language works237,207