MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Universidades Federais Brasileiras com Vagas para Refugiados

2023· article· en· W4384835047 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Victória Magri Moreira de Carvalho, Luiza Aparecida Ranuzzi, Pedro Lucchetti Silva, Tatiana Cardoso Squeff, Thiago Paluma

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Racism, and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas GeraisForeign Affairs and International Trade CanadaUniversity of TorontoUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaUniversidade Federal de UberlândiaCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research seeks to determine which federal universities have specific vacancies for refugees and to understand the specificities of their public notices. From an initial contact with the universities and a research based on a documentary and analytical methodology, a list of Brazilian universities that offer vacancies to refugees was made, as well as their common requirements. For this purpose, public notices published by the universities themselves were used, as well as legal documents that affirmed such affirmative actions within the internal regulations of these institutions. those that practice a more inclusive edict for refugees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de UberlândiaSame topicMigration, Racism, and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207