Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This book is an edited compilation of various pieces of legislation on the media and freedom of expression in Ghana.The book reflects the author's continuing interest in being useful and helpful to society and not to be content with his new status as one of the leading lights of the legal profession in Ghana.For a growing and expanding media industry and a social institution at the core of the democratisation process, books of reference for the media, such as this, are needed.These are times when no one really knows what should be done with our media and how they should be managed.For example, recent events at the Ghana Broadcasting Corporation where the removal of the Board by the National Media Commission (NMC) raised concerns about the role of the Commission simply heighten the importance and urgency of such a quest.What is clear is that there are no easy solutions.Or, perhaps no solution is possible.It will remain a continuing quest.The title of the book suggests that it is a 'source book.'To be specific, it is a publication for sourcing legislation relating to the media, speech and expression in Ghana.It is not a book on the law relating to these matters.It does not, for example, address judicial decisions.The contents are confined/limited to enacted (primary and subsidiary) law.In fact, they are thin on expression.The concentration is on legislation on
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it