MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384924590 · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-40041-2

Structures of channelrhodopsin paralogs in peptidiscs explain their contrasting K+ and Na+ selectivities

2023· article· en· W4384924590 on OpenAlexafffund
Takefumi Morizumi, Kyumhyuk Kim, Hai Li, Elena G. Govorunova, Oleg A. Sineshchekov, Yumei Wang, Lei Zheng, Éva Bertalan, Ana‐Nicoleta Bondar, Azam Askari, Leonid S. Brown, John L. Spudich, Oliver P. Ernst

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of General Medical SciencesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesGovernment of CanadaNational Institutes of HealthNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChannelrhodopsinOptogeneticsGatingChemistryBiophysicsSelectivityIon channelIntracellularPotassium channelTransmembrane domainExtracellularBiochemistryMembraneBiologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Kalium channelrhodopsin 1 from Hyphochytrium catenoides ( Hc KCR1) is a light-gated channel used for optogenetic silencing of mammalian neurons. It selects K + over Na + in the absence of the canonical tetrameric K + selectivity filter found universally in voltage- and ligand-gated channels. The genome of H. catenoides also encodes a highly homologous cation channelrhodopsin ( Hc CCR), a Na + channel with >100-fold larger Na + to K + permeability ratio. Here, we use cryo-electron microscopy to determine atomic structures of these two channels embedded in peptidiscs to elucidate structural foundations of their dramatically different cation selectivity. Together with structure-guided mutagenesis, we show that K + versus Na + selectivity is determined at two distinct sites on the putative ion conduction pathway: in a patch of critical residues in the intracellular segment (Leu69/Phe69, Ile73/Ser73 and Asp116) and within a cluster of aromatic residues in the extracellular segment (primarily, Trp102 and Tyr222). The two filters are on the opposite sides of the photoactive site involved in channel gating.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207