A Rare Case of Double Metal Sensitization after Pectus Excavatum Surgical Procedure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dermatitis®Vol. 34, No. 6 Pearls & ZebrasA Rare Case of Double Metal Sensitization After Pectus Excavatum Surgical ProcedureHelena Pires Pereira, Susana Lareiro, Isabel Carrapatoso, and Ana Todo-BomHelena Pires PereiraAddress reprint requests to Helena Pires Pereira, MD, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Coimbra University Hospital Center, Praceta Professor Mota Pinto, Coimbra 3000-561, Portugal. E-mail Address: [email protected]https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8681-0914From the Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Coimbra University Hospital Center, Coimbra, Portugal.H.P.P.: Conceptualization (lead); investigation (lead); visualization (lead); data curation (lead); writing—original draft (lead). S.L.: Resources (lead); visualization (supporting). I.C.: Supervision (supporting); visualization (supporting). A.T.-B.: Supervision (lead); visualization (supporting).Search for more papers by this author, Susana LareiroThoracic Surgery Department, Coimbra University Hospital Center, Coimbra, Portugal.H.P.P.: Conceptualization (lead); investigation (lead); visualization (lead); data curation (lead); writing—original draft (lead). S.L.: Resources (lead); visualization (supporting). I.C.: Supervision (supporting); visualization (supporting). A.T.-B.: Supervision (lead); visualization (supporting).Search for more papers by this author, Isabel CarrapatosoFrom the Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Coimbra University Hospital Center, Coimbra, Portugal.H.P.P.: Conceptualization (lead); investigation (lead); visualization (lead); data curation (lead); writing—original draft (lead). S.L.: Resources (lead); visualization (supporting). I.C.: Supervision (supporting); visualization (supporting). A.T.-B.: Supervision (lead); visualization (supporting).Search for more papers by this author, and Ana Todo-BomFrom the Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Coimbra University Hospital Center, Coimbra, Portugal.Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra University Hospital Center, Coimbra, Portugal.H.P.P.: Conceptualization (lead); investigation (lead); visualization (lead); data curation (lead); writing—original draft (lead). S.L.: Resources (lead); visualization (supporting). I.C.: Supervision (supporting); visualization (supporting). A.T.-B.: Supervision (lead); visualization (supporting).Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:16 Nov 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/derm.2023.0040AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookXLinked InRedditEmail View articleFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 34Issue 6Dec 2023 Information© 2023 American Contact Dermatitis Society. All Rights Reserved.To cite this article:Helena Pires Pereira, Susana Lareiro, Isabel Carrapatoso, and Ana Todo-Bom.A Rare Case of Double Metal Sensitization After Pectus Excavatum Surgical Procedure.Dermatitis®.Dec 2023.553-555.http://doi.org/10.1089/derm.2023.0040Published in Volume: 34 Issue 6: November 16, 2023Online Ahead of Print:July 20, 2023PDF download
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".