MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384926451 · doi:10.1080/01902148.2023.2237127

Force adaptation through the intravenous route in naïve mice

2023· article· en· W4384926451 on OpenAlexafffund
Magali Boucher, Cyndi Henry, Ynuk Bossé

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Lung Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval
KeywordsMethacholineRespiratory systemMedicineCumulative doseAirwayAnesthesiaChemistryInternal medicineLungRespiratory disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim of the study: Force adaptation is a process whereby the contractile capacity of the airway smooth muscle increases during a sustained contraction (aka tone). Tone also increases the response to a nebulized challenge with methacholine in vivo, presumably through force adaptation. Yet, due to its patchy pattern of deposition, nebulized methacholine often spurs small airway narrowing heterogeneity and closure, two important enhancers of the methacholine response. This raises the possibility that the potentiating effect of tone on the methacholine response is not due to force adaptation but by furthering heterogeneity and closure. Herein, methacholine was delivered homogenously through the intravenous (i.v.) route. Materials and Methods: Female and male BALB/c mice were subjected to one of two i.v. methacholine challenges, each of the same cumulative dose but starting by a 20-min period either with or without tone induced by serial i.v. boluses. Changes in respiratory mechanics were monitored throughout by oscillometry, and the response after the final dose was compared between the two challenges to assess the effect of tone. Results: For the elastance of the respiratory system (Ers), tone potentiated the methacholine response by 64 and 405% in females (37.4 ± 10.7 vs. 61.5 ± 15.1 cmH2O/mL; p = 0.01) and males (33.0 ± 14.3 vs. 166.7 ± 60.6 cmH2O/mL; p = 0.0004), respectively. For the resistance of the respiratory system (Rrs), tone potentiated the methacholine response by 129 and 225% in females (9.7 ± 3.5 vs. 22.2 ± 4.3 cmH2O·s/mL; p = 0.0003) and males (10.7 ± 3.1 vs. 34.7 ± 7.9 cmH2O·s/mL; p < 0.0001), respectively. Conclusions: As previously reported with nebulized challenges, tone increases the response to i.v. methacholine in both sexes; albeit sexual dimorphisms were obvious regarding the relative resistive versus elastic nature of this potentiation. This represents further support that tone increases the lung response to methacholine through force adaptation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental Lung ResearchSame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207