Exploration of Machine Learning Algorithms for pH and Moisture Estimation in Apples Using VIS-NIR Imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Non-destructive assessment of fruits for grading and quality determination is essential to automate pre- and post-harvest handling. Near-infrared (NIR) hyperspectral imaging (HSI) has already established itself as a powerful tool for characterizing the quality parameters of various fruits, including apples. The adoption of HSI is expected to grow exponentially if inexpensive tools are made available to growers and traders at the grassroots levels. To this end, the present study aims to explore the feasibility of using a low-cost visible-near-infrared (VIS-NIR) HSI in the 386–1028 nm wavelength range to predict the moisture content (MC) and pH of Pink Lady apples harvested at three different maturity stages. Five different machine learning algorithms, viz. partial least squares regression (PLSR), multiple linear regression (MLR), k-nearest neighbor (kNN), decision tree (DT), and artificial neural network (ANN) were utilized to analyze HSI data cubes. In the case of ANN, PLSR, and MLR models, data analysis modeling was performed using 11 optimum features identified using a Bootstrap Random Forest feature selection approach. Among the tested algorithms, ANN provided the best performance with R (correlation), and root mean squared error (RMSE) values of 0.868 and 0.756 for MC and 0.383 and 0.044 for pH prediction, respectively. The obtained results indicate that while the VIS-NIR HSI promises success in non-destructively measuring the MC of apples, its performance for pH prediction of the studied apple variety is poor. The present work contributes to the ongoing research in determining the full potential of VIS-NIR HSI technology in apple grading, maturity assessment, and shelf-life estimation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".