MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384935017 · doi:10.1115/1.4062974

Microstructure Analysis and Finite Element Modelling for Creep Failure Prediction and Fitness-For-Service Assessment of Superheater Tubes

2023· article· en· W4384935017 on OpenAlexaff
Sh. Zangeneh, H.R. Lashgari, Reza Moazed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Temperature Alloys and Creep
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperheaterCreepMaterials scienceMicrostructureService lifeMetallurgyOxideBoiler (water heating)MartensiteCarbideComposite materialEngineeringWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study aimed to perform a fitness-for-service assessment and investigate the root cause of failure of Grade 14CrMo3 steel seamless tubes typically used in superheaters in power generation plants. For this purpose, samples were taken from in-service superheater tubes in a 320 MW power plant. Thickness and hardness measurements were taken from the samples, and microstructural analyses were performed using scanning electron microscopy equipped with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. The results showed the presence of vanadium (V) and sulfur (S) elements on the tubes' external surface (flue gas facing-side), which is indicative of fuel ash corrosion. The formation of low melting point salts, such as Na2SO4, NaVO3, Na2O, and V2O5 (particularly between 10 and 2 o'clock positions) and degradation of the protective oxide layer led to loss of tube wall thickness. On the steam side of the tubes, the formation of an iron oxide layer (particularly between 12 and 2 o'clock positions) and the presence of water in the steam due to the improper function of the steam drum created an insulated zone leading to the formation of localized hot spots, creep microvoids, and spheroidization of carbides. In addition, a thickness reduction of 18% resulted in a considerable increase in hoop stresses having a detrimental effect on the remaining creep life. To explain the creep damage mechanism and determine the remaining creep life, the Larson–Miller criteria and API 579-1/ASME fitness-for-service-1 guidelines were utilized. The effects of the reduction in wall thickness were considered by performing a three-dimensional finite element analysis. The results showed that a temperature increase of only 50 °C (from 480 °C) could decrease the life of the tubes from 30 years to less than a year.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.529

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pressure Vessel TechnologySame topicHigh Temperature Alloys and CreepFrench-language works237,207