MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384941083 · doi:10.30770/2572-1852-109.2.12

Response to Barrett, et al, and Harter

2023· article· en· W4384941083 on OpenAlexaff
Gordon Giddings

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Regulation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Canadian institutionsCollege of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthMedicinePsychologyHealth careBalance (ability)Public healthNursingPsychiatryPolitical sciencePhysical therapyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We thank Dr. Barrett and colleagues and Dr. Harter for their thoughtful Letters regarding our recent JMR article titled “Do Medical Licensing Questions on Health Conditions Pose a Barrier to Physicians Seeking Treatment? A Literature Review.”1As regulators, we regulate in the public interest. Unless we could conclude that mental health never impacted fitness to practice, it would be difficult to remove a requirement for reporting some mental health concerns.As a self-regulating profession, we must work with physicians to address health concerns in a fair and compassionate manner to ensure physicians are healthy to care for patients.The challenge remains finding the right balance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.064
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.064
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0390.052
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.500
Teacher spread0.420 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical RegulationSame topicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutFrench-language works237,207