MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384949974 · doi:10.37715/leecom.v5i1.3619

PELATIHAN DAN IMPLEMENTASI TEKNOLOGI TENAGA SURYA UNTUK POMPA TANAMAN HYDROPONIK di RT 03 TAMBAK SEGARAN IV KELURAHAN TAMBAKREJO KECAMATAN SIMOKERTO KOTA SURABAYA

2023· article· id· W4384949974 on OpenAlexaff
Albert Gunadhi, Diana Lestariningsih, Rasional Sitepu

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal LeECOM (Leverage Engagement Empowerment of Community) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsForestryHorticultureHumanitiesArtGeographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wilayah RT 03, RW 03, Kelurahan Tambakrejo, Kecamatan Simokerto, Kota Surabaya merupakan salah satu RT yang aktif dalam mengembangkan lingkungannya. Terletak di Jalan Tambak Segaran IV dengan jumlah penduduk yang padat dan lebar jalan relatif sempit ±2m. Salah satu cara dalam pengembangan lingkungan adalah dengan budidaya tanaman hidroponik. Instalasi tanaman hidroponik hampir ada di setiap depan rumah warga. Untuk perawatan tanaman hidroponik membutuhkan aliran air mengalir secara terus menerus ±8 jam. Selama ini warga mengaktifkan pompa air dengan menggunakan listrik PLN. Hal ini menjadi salah satu kendala karena biaya listrik dalam satu bulan yang harus dibayarkan relatif memberatkan warga. Untuk mengatasi hal tersebut tim pengabdian memberikan wawasan pelatihan dan perancangan sumber listrik dari tenaga surya atau PLTS. Hal ini dibutuhkan untuk menghemat pemakaian listrik PLN secara jangka panjang yang sebelumnya dibebankan pada listrik rumah tangga. Hasil dari pengabdian adalah instalasi tanaman hidroponik dengan pompa air yang aktif menggunakan tenaga surya. Pompa yang digunakan adalah jenis pompa AC dengan daya masing-masing 15 watt, inverter yang dibutuhkan 100 watt dengan panel surya berukuran 150Wp. BCR yang dipilih berukuran 15A dan accu sesuai analisis perhitungan sebesar 10AH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal LeECOM (Leverage Engagement Empowerment of Community)Same topicEngineering and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207