MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385055758 · doi:10.1122/8.0000647

Effect of steady shear deformation on electrically conductive PP/PS/MWCNT composites

2023· article· en· W4385055758 on OpenAlexafffund
Daria Strugova, Éric David, Nicole R. Demarquette

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Rheology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer crystallization and properties
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialCarbon nanotubePercolation thresholdPolypropyleneRheologyElectrical conductorPolystyrenePercolation (cognitive psychology)NanocompositeElectrical resistivity and conductivityShear (geology)Shear rateDeformation (meteorology)Polymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conductive polymeric materials are commonly obtained by adding conductive nanoparticles to blends of immiscible polymers that form a cocontinuous morphology. However, during processing, morphology changes, affecting material properties. This study investigates the impact of steady shear deformation on the morphological and electrical properties of a model system consisting of polypropylene/polystyrene/multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). The findings reveal that the deformation results in the coarsening of the blend morphology and disruption of the electrical network, increasing both the rheological and electrical percolation threshold concentrations. The evolution of both electrical and morphological properties depends on MWCNT concentration, strain amplitude, and shear rate. The MWCNT concentration, below a certain level, leads to a disruption in electrical conductivity at high shear rates. However, if the MWCNT concentration is above 1 wt. %, the balance between filler network breakup and nanoparticle diffusion is maintained, resulting in stable electrical conductivity and morphology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of RheologySame topicPolymer crystallization and propertiesFrench-language works237,207