Adoption of the Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet Technique in Hand Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
» Wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique featuring tumescent infiltration of lidocaine with epinephrine at the operative site has broad application in hand surgery including both soft-tissue and bone procedures.» The advantages of wide-awake anesthesia include high patient satisfaction, preserved intraoperative finger and wrist motion, cost-effectiveness, improved operating room efficiency, fewer opioids during recovery, and improved access to hand surgery, which may be performed in an office-based setting without the need for anesthesia personnel.» In properly selected patients, use of lidocaine with epinephrine in the hand and fingers is safe. Rare postprocedure digital ischemia may be effectively treated with phentolamine rescue.» Barriers to adopting wide-awake anesthesia may be overcome by educating resistant stakeholders, including hospital administrators, nurse leaders, and anesthesia colleagues, about the advantages of the WALANT method.» The risk of postoperative complications after hand procedures may be mitigated by using the wide-awake technique instead of regional anesthesia with sedation or general anesthesia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".