Investigation of neurophysiologic and functional connectivity changes following glioma resection using magnetoencephalography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: In patients with glioma, clinical manifestations of neural network disruption include behavioral changes, cognitive decline, and seizures. However, the extent of network recovery following surgery remains unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize the neurophysiologic and functional connectivity changes following glioma surgery using magnetoencephalography (MEG). Methods: Ten patients with newly diagnosed intra-axial brain tumors undergoing surgical resection were enrolled in the study and completed at least two MEG recordings (pre-operative and immediate post-operative). An additional post-operative recording 6-8 weeks following surgery was obtained for six patients. Resting-state MEG recordings from 28 healthy controls were used for network-based comparisons. MEG data processing involved artifact suppression, high-pass filtering, and source localization. Functional connectivity between parcellated brain regions was estimated using coherence values from 116 virtual channels. Statistical analysis involved standard parametric tests. Results: Distinct alterations in spectral power following tumor resection were observed, with at least three frequency bands affected across all study subjects. Tumor location-related changes were observed in specific frequency bands unique to each patient. Recovery of regional functional connectivity occurred following glioma resection, as determined by local coherence normalization. Changes in inter-regional functional connectivity were mapped across the brain, with comparable changes in low to mid gamma-associated functional connectivity noted in four patients. Conclusion: Our findings provide a framework for future studies to examine other network changes in glioma patients. We demonstrate an intrinsic capacity for neural network regeneration in the post-operative setting. Further work should be aimed at correlating neurophysiologic changes with individual patients' clinical outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".