MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385069205 · doi:10.24144/2788-6018.2023.03.78

Legal basis of the international military cooperation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine during the Russian-Ukrainian war (2014- 2023)

2023· article· en· W4385069205 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Олександр Володимирович Турчак, Юрій Васильович Бураков, A.V. Posohova

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical and Comparative Jurisprudence · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianPolitical scienceEuropean unionGeneral partnershipCharterInternational lawNormativeMacedonianPublic administrationLawInternational tradeBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article deals with the analysis of the legal principles of international military cooperation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine during the Russian Ukrainian war. Its origins date back to the early 2000s.With the beginning of Russian aggression in 2014, a new stage of cooperation with NATO member countries was opened. It is connected with the decisions of the Wales, Warsaw and Brussels summits.International military cooperation with the institutions of the European Union was carried out in accordance with the Association Agreement with the European Union and related international regulations.In 2014, the Armed Forces of Ukraine joined the Partner Interoperability Initiative.The Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to Certain Laws of Ukraine Regarding Ukraine’s Refusal to Implement the Non-Alignment Policy” of December 23, 2014 became a landmark in the development of such cooperation.The main form of international cooperation was the participation of the Armed Forces in international military trainings. For this purpose, normative legal acts approving plans and participation in them were adopted annually.Cooperation with the defense departments of the Republic of Poland, the Baltic States, Great Britain, Canada, Turkey and a number of other countries was actively developed.Multilateral cooperation was carried out within the framework of the Charter on a special partnership, the annual Work Plan for the cooperation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the Secretariat of the Council of the EU.The National Security Strategy of Ukraine (2015) and the Sustainable Development Strategy “Ukraine-2020” were important program documents.A significant achievement in the development of relations with NATO was the granting of enhanced partner status to Ukraine on June 12, 2020.Further international normative acts and domestic legislation developed the foundations of military cooperation between Ukraine, the member countries of NATO and the European Union.Thus, it should be stated that Ukraine and its partners have established effective legal foundations for international military cooperation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical and Comparative JurisprudenceSame topicEuropean and Russian Geopolitical Military StrategiesFrench-language works237,207