MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385071202 · doi:10.1177/14759217231186357

A novel feature extraction method based on symbol-scale diversity entropy and its application for fault diagnosis of rotary machines

2023· article· en· W4385071202 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Health Monitoring · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEntropy (arrow of time)Computer scienceFeature extractionAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Robustness (evolution)Artificial intelligenceData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiscale entropy-based methods have made great progress in the field of health condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of machines due to their powerful feature representation capabilities. However, existing multiscale entropy methods suffer from three major obstacles: high fluctuation under large scale-factor, loss of high-frequency information, and poor robustness to noises. Thus, this work proposes a symbol-scale analysis method to deal with the above problems. In one aspect, to capture fault features from the time series over multiple time scales, time-delay process of different intervals is utilized to obtain long-term features and short-term features. In the other aspect, symbol-scale analysis introduces a symbolization procedure and maps time series into a corresponding sequence of symbols to overcome the limitation of weak fault extraction under a low-signal-to-noise ratio environment. Moreover, the symbol-scale entropy approach is developed by integrating with diversity entropy, called symbol-scale diversity entropy. The effectiveness of the proposed strategy is intensively validated using two simulated signals and experimental cases. Results demonstrate its advantages in dynamic change tracking ability and calculation efficiency by comparing it with other state-of-the-art entropy methods. Apart from diversity entropy, the versatility of incorporating the proposed symbol-scale analysis and other entropy methods is also verified using experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it