MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385071742 · doi:10.1093/micmic/ozad067.492

Expert- and Nonexpert-friendly Framework for Deep Learning Image Segmentation Demonstrates Successes Across Applications in vEM, CryoEM, MicroCT and Fluorescence Microscopy

2023· article· en· W4385071742 on OpenAlexaff
Jessica Heebner, Benjamin Provencher, Nicolas Piché, Mike Marsh

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroscopy and Microanalysis · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsObject Research Systems (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSegmentationArtificial intelligenceFluorescenceMicroscopyComputer scienceMaterials scienceNanotechnologyOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have demonstrated tremendous capacity for object classification and labeling, image denoising, and image segmentation tasks in demanding biological applications. Numerous CNN solutions have been reported over the past decade for these applications, but they are frequently specialized for a particular imaging modality, and they are often nontrivial to deploy by nonexperts. Further, there persists a widespread misconception that deep learning networks require enormous volumes of annotated training data to reach levels of high accuracy and high robustness. Here we present an update on Segmentation Wizard [1], a framework that encapsulates and organizes training data with associated CNN models for training. Segmentation Wizard exists as a feature in the commercially available deep learning enabled Dragonfly image analysis software [2], licensed at no cost for non-commercial use in most territories. We report two novel enhancements to Segmentation Wizard, image intensity calibration and access to general-purpose pre-trained models. We show here how inexperienced users can prepare and maintain ground truth segmentations and train multiple models simultaneously to high performance and robustness, often with less than 5MPix of curated ground truth. We demonstrate example successes in stained tissue volume EM (vEM) (both FIBSEM and SBFSEM), unstained cellular cryoEM (cryoET and cryoFIBSEM), x-ray microCT, and fluorescence microscopy. Segmentation Wizard is installed by default with the standard installer of Dragonfly for both Windows and Linux, negating any requirements for configuration expertise. Updated Dragonfly installers are provided one to three times every year, delivering feature updates, but also support for the latest generation of CUDA-enabled GPUs. The initial release of deep learning tools in 2018 was built on TensorFlow 1.6. Frequent software releases have shipped to track with TensorFlow updates; the current production release is on TensorFlow 2.4, and the next update will be linked against 2.11. One of the primary benefits of Segmentation Wizard is to provide a user-friendly experience to nonexperts. Tuning of hyperparameters and data augmentation settings are available by experts, who may also import Keras models or manually design and revise novel model architectures. But nonexpert users are encouraged to accept default settings which are well-optimized for most cases. After users have prepared frames of labeled data to be taken as ground truth, the framework lets users train and compare multiple CNN models. The variety of models includes multiple U-Net derivatives as well as DenseNet architectures and others. The models are classified as 2D, 2.5D, or 3D, to indicate that they consider only one slice of grayscale image data at a time, multiple slices, or multiple slices with 3D convolutional kernels. Through the use of general-purpose pretrained models and aggressive data augmentation, models require only a small volume of training data, and training new models is rapid and not very computationally expensive. In cases where users have followed the intensity calibration protocol, model training and inference happens on calibrated intensities rather than raw image intensities, but intensity calibration is always reversible. Model training can be monitored in real time, with the conclusion of training each epoch, the user is presented with a visualization of the model prediction for that epoch; this is greatly preferred to monitoring only the numerical loss function or waiting until training is concluded to visualization the model’s predictive performance. Finally, we note that Segmentation Wizard boosts productivity by letting users make intermediate predictions which can easily be corrected and inserted into the training volume for further training. Application to stained vEM tissues is useful for labeling image data coming from FIBSEM and SBFSEM experiments. We showcase here the work on human retinal pigment epithelium and adjoining neural tissue [3]. These samples are often large volumes (200GB image datasets) spanning many lateral microns of tissue. The segmentation we present shows that segmentation can resolve and label more than 10 classes of cellular ultrastructure (Fig 1) with high fidelity. Left: 2D rendering of 2D U-Net segmentation of SBFSEM of human retinal pigment epithelium and adjacent photoreceptor outer segments. Right: 3D rendering of 2D U-Net segmentation of cryo-PFIBSEM of a Chlamydomonas cell (EMPIAR 11275). Previous success in cryoEM data has been demonstrated and described in general [4] and with training data augmented by digital phantoms [5]. We show now this success extends to cryo-PFIBSEM (Fig 1) as seen on data generously shared publicly (EMPIAR-11275) [6]. It is notable because this 13-class model was trained on only five slices of the dataset and was segmented by a nonexpert referencing a cartoon diagram of Chlamydomonas cellular ultrastructure. This automated segmentation of this sample was achieved with fewer than three days of investigator time. This trained model can be applied to additional datasets of the same type without any additional training. With continuous refinement since it was first described in 2018, Segmentation Wizard is now a mature, user-friendly, and intuitive platform for training deep learning models for any biological imaging modality. Both novice and advanced users will find it useful and easy to use with multiple published tutorials for various use cases. Recent enhancements further drive high productivity for automated segmentation across a wide application space for imaging scientists working in biological systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicroscopy and MicroanalysisSame topicAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207