Oscillating neural circuits: Phase, amplitude, and the complex normal distribution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multiple oscillating time series are typically analyzed in the frequency domain, where coherence is usually said to represent the magnitude of the correlation between two signals at a particular frequency. The correlation being referenced is complex-valued and is similar to the real-valued Pearson correlation in some ways but not others. We discuss the dependence among oscillating series in the context of the multivariate complex normal distribution, which plays a role for vectors of complex random variables analogous to the usual multivariate normal distribution for vectors of real-valued random variables. We emphasize special cases that are valuable for the neural data we are interested in and provide new variations on existing results. We then introduce a complex latent variable model for narrowly band-pass-filtered signals at some frequency, and show that the resulting maximum likelihood estimate produces a latent coherence that is equivalent to the magnitude of the complex canonical correlation at the given frequency. We also derive an equivalence between partial coherence and the magnitude of complex partial correlation, at a given frequency. Our theoretical framework leads to interpretable results for an interesting multivariate dataset from the Allen Institute for Brain Science.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".