MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385073648 · doi:10.1002/cjs.11790

Oscillating neural circuits: Phase, amplitude, and the complex normal distribution

2023· article· en· W4385073648 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Konrad N. Urban, Heejong Bong, Josue Orellana, Robert E. Kass

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Statistics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on Drug AbuseNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Canonical correlationMultivariate statisticsMathematicsFrequency domainLatent variableSeries (stratigraphy)Multivariate normal distributionStatistical physicsAmplitudeCorrelationStatisticsMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple oscillating time series are typically analyzed in the frequency domain, where coherence is usually said to represent the magnitude of the correlation between two signals at a particular frequency. The correlation being referenced is complex-valued and is similar to the real-valued Pearson correlation in some ways but not others. We discuss the dependence among oscillating series in the context of the multivariate complex normal distribution, which plays a role for vectors of complex random variables analogous to the usual multivariate normal distribution for vectors of real-valued random variables. We emphasize special cases that are valuable for the neural data we are interested in and provide new variations on existing results. We then introduce a complex latent variable model for narrowly band-pass-filtered signals at some frequency, and show that the resulting maximum likelihood estimate produces a latent coherence that is equivalent to the magnitude of the complex canonical correlation at the given frequency. We also derive an equivalence between partial coherence and the magnitude of complex partial correlation, at a given frequency. Our theoretical framework leads to interpretable results for an interesting multivariate dataset from the Allen Institute for Brain Science.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of StatisticsSame topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207