Fine‐scale environment control on ground surface temperature and thaw depth in a High Arctic tundra landscape
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Surface conditions are known to mediate the impacts of climate warming on permafrost. This calls for a better understanding of the environmental conditions that control the thermal regime and the depth of the active layer, especially within heterogeneous tundra landscapes. This study analyzed the spatial relationships between thaw depths, ground surface temperature (GST), and environmental conditions in a High Arctic tundra environment at Bylot Island, Nunavut, Canada. Measurements were distributed within the two dominant landforms, namely earth hummocks and low‐center polygons, and across a topographic gradient. Our results revealed that GST and thaw depth were highly heterogeneous, varying by up to 3.7°C and by more than 20 cm over short distances (<1 m) within periglacial landforms. This microscale variability sometimes surpassed the variability at the hillslope scale, especially in summer. Late‐winter snowpack thickness was found to be the prime control on the spatial variability in winter soil temperatures due to the highly heterogeneous snow cover induced by blowing snow, and this thermal effect carried over into summer. However, microtopography was the predominant driver of the spatial variability in summer GST, followed by altitude and moss thickness. In contrast, the spatial variability in thaw depth was influenced predominantly by variations in moss thickness. Hence, summer microclimate conditions dominated active layer development, but a thicker snowpack favored soil cooling in the following summer, due to the later disappearance of snow cover. These results enhance our understanding of High Arctic tundra environments and highlight the complexity of considering surface feedback effects in future projections of permafrost states within heterogeneous tundra landscapes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".