MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385077755 · doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ace3f7

Rubin Observatory LSST Stars Milky Way and Local Volume Star Clusters Roadmap

2023· article· en· W4385077755 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher Usher, Kristen C. Dage, L. Girardi, P. Barmby, C. Bonatto, Ana L. Chies-Santos, W. I. Clarkson, M. Gómez, Eduardo A. Hartmann, A. M. N. Ferguson, A. Pieres, L. Prisinzano, Katherine L. Rhode, R. Michael Rich, V. Ripepi, B. X. Santiago, Keivan G. Stassun, R. A. Street, R. Szabó, L. Venuti, S. Zaggia, Marco A. Canossa-Gosteinski, Pedro Floriano, Pedro Lopes, Nicole L. Miranda, R. A. P. Oliveira, Marta Reina-Campos, Alexandre Roman–Lopes, Jennifer Sobeck

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoWestern UniversityMcGill University
FundersHeising-Simons Foundation
KeywordsMilky WayPhysicsStarsStar clusterObservatorySkyAstronomyStar (game theory)AstrophysicsGlobular clusterCluster (spacecraft)Computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Vera C. Rubin Observatory will undertake the Legacy Survey of Space and Time, providing an unprecedented, volume-limited catalog of star clusters in the Southern Sky, including Galactic and extragalactic star clusters. The Star Clusters subgroup of the Stars, Milky Way and Local Volume Working Group has identified key areas where Rubin Observatory will enable significant progress in star cluster research. This roadmap represents our science cases and preparation for studies of all kinds of star clusters from the Milky Way out to distances of tens of megaparsecs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0600.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications of the Astronomical Society of the PacificSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207