An Enhanced Outlier Detection Approach for Multidimensional Datasets Using a Synergistic Firefly and Grey Wolf Optimization-Based Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Outlier identification and elimination are essential preprocessing steps for data analysis tasks such as clustering, classification, and regression.The accuracy of data analysis outcomes may be compromised if outliers are not adequately addressed.Detecting outliers is particularly challenging when they are characterized by unusual combinations of multiple attributes.Furthermore, the presence of outliers can impact various data processing activities, necessitating either the reduction of outlier influence or their complete removal.Outlier detection in multivariate data presents a complex process that becomes increasingly difficult when dealing with high-dimensional datasets.Consequently, this study focuses on the identification of such outliers in multivariate datasets using intelligent techniques.In the proposed approach, outliers are detected using an Improved Neural Network (INN), where the hidden neurons are tuned by a novel Synergistic Firefly-Grey Wolf Optimization (SF-GWO) algorithm.This algorithm combines the strengths of the Firefly Optimization (SFO) and Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) techniques to maximize accuracy.The unique method results in enhanced classification model performance, reduced computation time, and increased classification accuracy.The proposed model has been evaluated and compared with well-established traditional techniques, demonstrating its effectiveness in addressing the challenges of outlier detection in multidimensional datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".