MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385078510 · doi:10.18280/isi.280304

Experimental Investigations to Fault Reduction System for Software Applications

2023· article· en· W4385078510 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
V Rashmi, Chetla Chandra Mohan, Vasantha Bhavani, Anuradha Yarlagadda, B Sowjanya, Kusuma Sundara Kumar, K. Koteswara Rao, Anil Kumar Pallikonda

Bibliographic record

VenueIngénierie des systèmes d information · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Reliability and Analysis Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReduction (mathematics)Computer scienceSoftwareReliability engineeringFault (geology)EngineeringGeologyOperating systemSeismologyMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fault reduction system for software applications is put forward in direct random testing which includes two phases i.e., test case generation and false reduction.The system's primary components are a database, a false reduction mechanism, a test case creation mechanism, and an application selection mechanism.By using feature values from the input application, the test case generation method sets up an Object Behaviour Dependence Model (OBDM) to produce test cases.In addition to the indistinguishable inputs, the false reduction method configures an Adaptive Genetic Algorithm (AGA) to minimise the banned inputs.The AGA graciously accepts the exposure measurements of the experiment circumstances in order to considerably reduce the tendency to make mistakes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIngénierie des systèmes d informationSame topicSoftware Reliability and Analysis ResearchFrench-language works237,207