MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SEVDA: Singular Value Decomposition Based Parallel Write Scheme for Memristive CNN Accelerators

2023· article· en· W4385080174 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Al-Shaarawy, Roman Genov, Amirali Amirsoleimani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrossbar switchComputer scienceSingular value decompositionParallel computingConvolutional neural networkFLOPSArtificial neural networkVon Neumann architectureMultiplication (music)Matrix multiplicationAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsQuantum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Von Neumann architecture-based deep neural network architectures are fundamentally bottlenecked by the need to transfer data from memory to compute units. Memristor crossbar-based accelerators overcome this by leveraging Kirchoff's law to perform matrix-vector multiplication (MVM) in-memory. They still, however, are relatively inefficient in their device programming schemes, requiring individual devices to be written sequentially or row-by-row. Parallel writing schemes have recently emerged, which program entire crossbars simultaneously through the outer product of bit-line and word-line voltages and pulse widths respectively. We propose a scheme that leverages singular value decomposition and low-rank approximation to generate all word-line and bit-line vectors needed to program a convolutional neural network (CNN) onto a memristive crossbar-based accelerator. Our scheme reduces programming latency by 90% from row-by-row programming schemes, while maintaining high test accuracy on state of the art image classification models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.555
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207