MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sir Robert Cecil

2023· reference-entry· en· W4385144758 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Paul E. J. Hammer

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2023
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWifeBrotherReignPoliticsThroneFellState (computer science)HistoryClassicsLawArtAncient historyPolitical scienceCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sir Robert Cecil (b. 1563–d. 1612), created 1st earl of Salisbury in 1605, was the most influential politician in the final years of Elizabeth I’s reign and played a leading role in the first decade of James VI & I’s occupancy of the English throne. Cecil’s political stature was perhaps all the more remarkable because of his scoliosis, which gave him a distinct hump in his back and prompted a great deal of cruel mockery. Cecil was the younger son of Sir William Cecil, 1st Baron Burghley, and his second wife, Mildred (née Cooke). Cecil’s older half-brother, Sir Thomas Cecil, succeeded their father as 2nd Baron Burghley in 1598. In August 1589, Cecil married Elizabeth Brooke, the daughter of William Brooke, 10th Lord Cobham. The couple had a son and daughter before Lady Cecil’s death in 1597. Cecil never remarried. Cecil was knighted in May 1591 and was sworn to the privy council less than three months later. Thanks to the vast influence of his father, it was widely expected that Cecil would be appointed as secretary pf state when the office fell vacant in 1590, but his hopes were repeatedly dashed. Indeed, the secretaryship became a bone of contention between the Cecils and Elizabeth’s new favorite, Robert Devereux, 2nd earl of Essex. This rivalry proved to be a major feature of English politics in the 1590s and the conflict between Essex and Cecil, especially after 1598, had a profound impact upon the latter’s career and posthumous reputation. Cecil was finally appointed secretary of state in July 1596. In October 1597, he also became chancellor of the duchy of Lancaster. In May 1599, he resigned the latter office to accept the more lucrative mastership of the wards, which his father had previously held for many years. This further poisoned relations with Essex, who had been promised the mastership by the queen. Ultimately, these tensions exploded in the so-called Essex Rising of 8 February 1601, which resulted in the execution of Essex for treason and rebellion. The destruction of Essex and his faction cleared the way for Cecil to replace the earl as James’s secret kingmaker in England and to cement his status as the realm’s most influential councillor in Elizabeth’s twilight years. Between the summer of 1601 and the death of Elizabeth in March 1603, Cecil and James engaged in a “secret correspondence” which paved the way for the latter’s succession. The peaceful accession of James VI of Scotland as James I of England represented a great triumph for Cecil, but it also radically changed the political environment and forced him to compete with other favored courtiers for influence on the new king. Cecil continued as principal secretary of state, but he was no longer the dominant figure at court. His creation as Baron Cecil of Essendon in May 1603 seemed a meager reward for his secret work to ensure that James would succeed Elizabeth unchallenged. Cecil subsequently helped to lead negotiations for the peace with Spain, which resulted in the Treaty of London in August 1604. That same month, Cecil was promoted to become Viscount Cranborne. In May 1605, he was further advanced to the earldom of Salisbury. He became a knight of the Garter in 1606. By then, Cecil’s management of the response to the Gunpowder Plot of 5 November 1605 had reestablished his leading role in government. Nevertheless, Cecil was forced into an exchange with James in 1607, handing over the vast private palace at Theobalds which he had inherited from his father and in return receiving the much less valuable royal manor of Hatfield. Cecil thereafter poured large sums of money into rebuilding Hatfield House, having already spent heavily on his London townhouse in the final years of Elizabeth’s reign. This expenditure reflected his large income from a variety of sources (including a pension from Spain after James’s accession). In May 1608 he became lord treasurer, while still retaining the secretaryship and mastership of the wards. Like his father, Cecil’s career therefore culminated in a remarkable pluralism of key royal offices. Cecil proved to be an active lord treasurer who aspired to reform the increasingly problematic royal finances, most notably in his proposal for a Great Contract between the king and parliament in 1610. The failure of this initiative seriously damaged Cecil’s political standing. Although he retained his offices, Cecil’s political decline was underlined by the rising fortunes of Robert Carr, the Scottish favorite who would later become earl of Somerset. By the end of 1611, Cecil’s health was also clearly in decline. He died in May 1612. Cecil had been attacked by anonymous libelers and satirists throughout his career, but his death encouraged a veritable flood of libels which poured scorn on his character and viciously mocked the achievements of his career. However, in a longer historical perspective, Cecil’s career arguably came close to matching the significance, if not the longevity, of that of his famous father.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.565

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1690.080

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicScottish History and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207