Computational Framework for Turbid Water Single-Pixel Imaging by Polynomial Regression and Feature Enhancement
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The quality of underwater imaging is greatly impacted by the scattering and absorption of light in turbid water environments. Single pixel imaging (SPI) has emerged as a promising solution for turbid underwater imaging, as it effectively suppresses the effects of scattering and is cost-effective due to the use of a single photodetector. However, the quality of SPI in highly turbid water is still unsatisfactory. To address this issue, we propose a novel computational framework for turbid water single-pixel imaging. The framework involves a machine learning-based polynomial regression fitting method, followed by data feature enhancement in the spectrum domain to obtain the rectified data, and ultimately, high-contrast image recovery. Furthermore, we propose a new metric, Edge Detection-based Enhancement Measure Evaluation (EDEME), to quantitatively evaluate the contrast of the recovered images. Our experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method can recover images in low turbidity water to a level comparable to clear water, and even in highly turbid water (turbidity greater than 50 NTU), the recovered images are legible with significantly improved EDEME values. Additionally, our method exhibits wide adaptability, requires minimal data operations, and outperforms some post-image processing methods. This work has significant implications for imaging, inspections, search and rescue, resource exploitation, and other applications in underwater environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it