MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385153585 · doi:10.3389/978-2-8325-3006-1

Highlights in Disability, Rehabilitation, and Inclusion 2021/22

2023· book· en· W4385153585 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Daniel Mont, Toyin Janet Aderemi

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers research topics · 2023
Typebook
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Systems and Public Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceRick Hansen FoundationUniversity of OttawaMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNorthern Illinois University
KeywordsInclusion (mineral)RehabilitationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychologyMedicineNeuroscienceSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are pleased to introduce the collection Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences – Highlights in Disability, Rehabilitation, and Inclusion 2021/22. This collection will welcome and showcase a selection of high impact articles authored by leaders in the field.<br/><br/>The work presented here highlights the broad diversity of research performed across the Disability, Rehabilitation, and Inclusion section, and aims to put a spotlight on the main areas of interest.<br/><br/>This collection aims to further support Frontiers’ strong community by shining a spotlight on our authors' highly impactful research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score0.869

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers research topicsSame topicHealthcare Systems and Public HealthFrench-language works237,207