Imaginea Craiovei în paginile Revistei „Arhivele Olteniei”, seria veche
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Arhivele Olteniei" Review represented and represents a specialized publishing platform, which brings together related disciplines, exciting themes, raising the bar from regional to national and even international, through the information and methodology performed. The authors who contributed to the pages of this review knew how to capitalize studies of remarcable socio-cultural phenomena, "archiving" among others elements of the cultural memory of Craiova. This city, although it experienced disruptions over time, continued to live on in the collective memory through different forms: old street names, the names of houses belonging to the great aristocratic families, urban spaces that preserve the old memories - names of old shops, spaces that remind of the presence of certain personalities of the city, old inns, old neighborhoods, such as the Jewish quarter or the Clisurean Quarter, slums, such as Mahalaua Sârbilor, churches specific to certain old neighborhoods - Obedeanu, Sf. Gheorghe cel Nou, Mântuleasa and many others.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".